[chabulier]

This feature should be considered into core function. In many times we only care about the count. As I now, both the textPad, NotePad++ has this feature. Maybe the count function is hard for RegExp?

[chabulier]

I found the recent alpha versions often crashed when process some huge files. But when I move to 8.05, it works fine.

Is there any other person who found this? or do we already fix this issue? :-)

[chabulier]

To negedge,
It works as you wish. Emeditor will copy the whole line if it’s not empty. :lol:

[chabulier]

Just downloaded the RC5. Yeah, it’s cool. This issue have gone. Thanks a lot Yutaka,
BTW, since didn’t see the change logs for this item so sorry.

[chabulier]

this is not a big thing, but is there some one who want to copy a CR/LF to override the clipboard content?

[chabulier]

colon wrote:
Copy as html/rich text/tex would be nice. Then source code could be added to documents with blue keywords etc.

I have suggested add this feature in to the core or development a plugin. Seems author do not want expand the core size. And we already have a plugin to export as HTML.

[chabulier]

Not sure why, but have crashed several times after using this version.

[chabulier]

I tryed to search without regular expressions, it looks works.

Any suggestions?

[chabulier]

OK, it works now, not sure why just now the value can not be changed to larger than 1,000,000.

The replace speed is better than before version. Have you noticed the Undo slower than the before version?

In my case, it takes almost 15 secs to finish the Undo action. In before version I think it only need one sec. However the Undo action is not a common function for large file than search.

Thanks a lot for your support. Wish it can be more faster and powerful. :-)

[chabulier]

If you have more than one million tokens to replace, you will need to increase the value in the Undo Max Number text box in the General tab of configuration properties. I might increase this default value, and also add the warning message box when undo may not be available.

I don’t think it’s the problem. In fact my file only have 931380 lines, and only 894261 entries were replaced. The max undo number should be 1,000,000(However this value seems can not be set more larger).

Thanks for your reply. Please let me know if you need more information for recreate this issue.

[chabulier]

it’s true.
In my local test. 2G mem T60
File Size: 114M
Total Lines: 1,183,428
search “INFO”
replace with “[INFORMATION]”
Matched 63,158
not match case
both open blank display

TextPad 5.2
2.60 secs
EmEditor 7.05
25~26 secs

However Emeditor give more function:
1) process bar and highlight.
2) emeditor empty display more pretty.
3) Emeditor’s fronts support customize looks more better.
4) Emeditor can open huge files, but Textpad have a limit.

[chabulier]

Oh, it works now.
So we need manually run this macro for using this function? Is there any other config settings that Emeditor can automatically detected this just like a normal link?

Thanks a lot, Yutaka.

[chabulier]

document.HighlightTag = true;

When I open a saved search results and run this macro, nothing was changed. The Link still not works.

My original suggestion was that we can save the searching results(Find in Files) as original format. That means next time we open this file, we still can click on the link and point to that file’s position.

Such like when we click on this link C:temp.txt:4621 Emeditor will open that file and located to line:4621.

This should be a pretty useful function, pls advise. :-)

[chabulier]

Thanks for your so quickly reply.
For the first one, you will add this feature(save the search results link and discorery the link with row number) as windows link “file://” ?

For the second one, is there any plugin support RTF export and copy?

[chabulier]

OK, it works now. Thanks a lot.

[chabulier]

Even you open an UTF8 file which contains special char, when you click save it will not work, fortunately the save as still can work.

Definately this is not we expect.

[chabulier]

checked the “search only word” then it occurs.
Yes,reproduce both 6.00.2 and 6.00.3

[Author]

Posts