Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
Cirillo
ParticipantHi user
Try this old one:
http://www.emeditor.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=8&lid=180Cirillo
ParticipantHello user!
You may want to use the following .jsee macro
//---Begin Macro---
Window.Redraw = false;
// remove trailing blanks (whitespaces, tabs ecc.) & their combos
document.selection.Replace ("([[:blank:]]){2,}", "1", eeFindReplaceRegExp | eeFindAround | eeReplaceAll | eeFindReplaceQuiet);
// remove StartOfLine blanks
document.selection.Replace ("^[[:blank:]]", "", eeFindReplaceRegExp | eeFindAround | eeReplaceAll | eeFindReplaceQuiet);
// remove EndOfLine blanks
document.selection.Replace ("[[:blank:]]$", "", eeFindReplaceRegExp | eeFindAround | eeReplaceAll | eeFindReplaceQuiet);
document.selection.StartOfDocument (false);
document.HighlightFind = false;
Window.Redraw = true;
//---End Macro---Hope this will help.
Cirillo
ParticipantYutaka,
thanks for the explanation!
Emeditor.exe and some libs are a bit different though, I guess it’s the new digital signature.Cirillo
ParticipantIn my case the problem has a somewhat different angle.
When I check ‘In the selection only’, ‘Find Next’ and ‘Replace’ buttons turn inactive.Cirillo
Participanthello
For parameters pls check built-in help:
EmEditor Help – EmEditor Macro Reference – Selection Object – Replace MethodCirillo
ParticipantHello!
You don’t really need a macro to run this task.
All you need is Menu > Search > Replace in Files.
More info in EmEditor Help-How to…-Search-Replace in Files.
GL :-)Cirillo
ParticipantHi,
There’s a macro in the Library here. It extracts lines not containing a specified string to a new file.
http://www.emeditor.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=8&lid=170
Give it a try, hope that helps :-)July 29, 2010 at 11:47 am in reply to: Regular Expression Searching Too Slow In Some Large Text Files #8810Cirillo
ParticipantHi spudly
I did a Replace All changing n with ,n
That’s a well known issue. EmEditor slows down greatly when A New Line expression is used in a regex search/replace string. In some cases one can evade it by using $ (End of String) instead of n, it depends on the given text.
Cirillo
ParticipantThe default combo is Ctrl+L for line delete (or Shift+Delete or Ctrl+X for selection delete: deletes the whole line if there’s no selection).
You can change it via Tools>Properties for Current Configuration (or for All Configurations)>Keyboard>Category:Edit>Commands:Cut Line (or Cut).
You can also use Help>Keyboard Map… I beleive this is for current config only.Cirillo
ParticipantHi user
how do I disable emeditor tray from loading on startup and generally ?
Tools > Customize… > Shortcut > Display a tray icon to the task bar and Display a tray icon next time Windows starts
Cirillo
ParticipantI guess a single ALT key isn’t supported as a hotkey.
Cirillo
ParticipantHi zhouzh2
Yeah, thanks, script directives are what I really missed :-)
But the puzzle hasn’t been solved yet, because a macro in a basic toolbar must have its “alter ego” in the macros toolbar. I mean, if I delete the macro from the macros toolbar it disappears from the basic toolbar, too :-?Cirillo
ParticipantAt the moment you right-click, EmEditor exits without an error message.
I can see some figures :-)
Instruction address 0x00451a54
Memory address 0x04220069Crash confirmed. I’m on WinXP SP3.
Cirillo
ParticipantHi Yutaka
Sure. I will try to use newer version but I prefer doing on major version upgrade.
That sounds promising :)
What are the difference between 1.2.9 and 1.2.11?
Wish I knew… Maintenance release bug fixes
I cannot support if you replace the DLL, and I don’t know if it is different. If you want, you can try it at your own risk.
It’s OK with the support, I was going to do some tests on the trial version. The obvious difference is that the DDL is digitally signed by EmuraSoft. Frankly, I’m not that good at compiling C++ projects, so my first attempts to insert a newer DLL failed. One “build” led to an error in EmEditor launch, the other let the editor start up but hung it up during the spellcheck.
Thanks, anyway!
Cirillo
ParticipantHello Yutaka,
Thanks for having answered the point. I’ll try a portable version, too. Since the files I usually edit range from 0.5Mb to max 10Mb, I don’t think the speed of your fantastic editor will be much influenced by the portable launch.- AuthorPosts